|
1
|
- Yoram Agmon MD
- Department of Cardiology
- Rambam Medical Center
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
- HAIFA
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Look at the patient
- Look at the ventricle (LV systolic function)
- Look at the atrium (LA)
- Mitral inflow
- Additional techniques – when necessary
- Estimate PA pressure
- Beware of caveats
- Reporting diastolic function
|
|
13
|
- Diastolic function / LV filling pressures are frequently obvious
clinically
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- “E < A (mitral inflow), a manifestation of LV diastolic dysfunction”
- E < A – may be normal for age (wide range)
- E < A – may be normal for a relatively young patient in the presence
of relatively rapid HR
- E/A < 0.5 – usually LV diastolic dysfunction
- DT - supportive of Dx
- Mild (abnormal relaxation pattern)
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- LV systolic function
- LV hypertrophy
- Suspect LV diastolic dysfunction
- Not necessarily advanced diastolic dysfunction !
- LV filling pressures – may be normal !
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Marker of diastolic dysfunction
- Systolic dysfunction ® LV volumes
- End-systolic volume
- ®
Elastic recoil ¯
- End-diastolic volume
- ®
LV operative compliance ¯
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- What is “preserved” LV systolic function ?
- Global LVEF >50% / >45% / 40% ?
- Regional wall motion abnormalities ?
- Effect of age
- Young pts ® ~ normal global
LV filling
- despite mild-moderate LV systolic dysFx
|
|
26
|
- Sensitive marker of LV filling pressures
- Limitations:
- Measurement of LA size (dimension / volume) ?
- Normal age-related values
- Effects of acute D loading
(diuresis; AMI)
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Normal PA pressure
- Advanced diastolic dysfunction – less likely
- Elevated PA pressure
- Rule-out diastolic dysfunction (as cause of diastolic dysfunction)
|
|
29
|
- Pulmonary venous flow
- Mean diastolic / end-diastolic parameters
- Less load-dependent techniques
- Tissue Doppler
- Color M-mode – flow propagation
- Loading manipulations
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- PV ARdur minus mitral Adur > 30 ms
- PV ARvel > 45 cm/s
- ® LVEDP
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Annular velocity measurements
- Septal ?
- Lateral ?
- Average ?
- Effect of segmental WMAs ?
- Velocities ¯ on affected side
- Compensatory on other side
?
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- e’, FPV » LV relaxation
- LV diastolic dysFx ®
- LV relaxation ¯ ® e’, FPV ¯
- LV filling pressures ® E
- ® E / e’
- ® E / FPV
|
|
44
|
- TD
- E / e’ septal ³ 15
- (8-15 = borderline)
- E / e’ lateral ³ 10
- CMM
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- Limited feasibility
- Patients (uncontrolled maneuver)
- Operators
- Effect on HR ()
- Variable diagnostic criteria
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- E/A > 1.0 – inadequate cutoff (elderly pts)
- Alternative cutoff
- Normal age-related range of E/A ratio
- Normal vs pseudo-normal (elevated filling pressures)
- For most pts with HF (elderly) – E/A > 0.7
- Border between pseudo-normal & restrictive
- Clinically less important (both – “advanced DDFx”)
- > 1.5-2.0 or DT < 140 ms (SR) = restrictive
|
|
52
|
- Problematic subgroups
- Normal systolic function
- Young patients
- Use validated criteria
- Remember
- Real life – doesn’t always work by the book
- Conclusive assessment – not always feasible
|
|
53
|
|